Interstate Custody Arrangements in a
Pennsylvania Divorce
All states and the District of Columbia have enacted a
statute called the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, which sets
standards for when a court may make a custody determination and when a
court must defer to an existing determination from another state. In
general, a state may make a custody decision about a child if (in order of
preference):
- the state is the child's home
state -- this means the child has resided in the state for the six
previous months, or was residing in the state but is absent because a
parent has removed the child from or retained the child outside of the
state
- there are significant
connections with people -- such as teachers, doctors and grandparents
-- and substantial evidence in the state concerning the child's care,
protection, training and personal relationships
- the child is in the state and
has been either abandoned or is in danger of being abused or neglected
if sent back to the other state, or
- no other state can meet one of
the above three tests, or a state can meet at least one of the tests
but has declined to make a custody decision.
If a state cannot meet one of these tests, even if the
child is present in the state, the courts of that state cannot make a
custody award. Also, a parent who has wrongfully removed or retained a
child in order to create a home state or significant connections will be
denied custody. In the event more than one state meets the above
standards, the law requires that only one state award custody. This means
that once the first state makes a custody award, another state can neither
make another "initial" award nor modify the existing order.
Having the same law in all states helps achieve
consistency in the treatment of custody decrees. It also helps solve many
of the problems created by kidnapping or disagreements over custody
between parents living in different states.
(back to top) |